On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:45:19AM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
> Hmm, we're missing a return 0; here. The number of return points and the
> moved up variable declarations worries me a little. I'll see if I can clean
> this up a bit, but would prefer to make a follow-up patch in that case.
By all means.
It was just a suggestion anyway - see if you prefer this better or would
like to keep the old style.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
