Correct "constraints guarantees" to "constraint guarantees".
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt index 6e651b7e62c328be..4ef0de5c0c7f5990 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ the worst case since it depends on the CPU operating conditions, i.e. caches state). An OS has to reliably probe the wakeup-latency since some devices can enforce -latency constraints guarantees to work properly, so the OS has to detect the +latency constraint guarantees to work properly, so the OS has to detect the worst case wake-up latency it can incur if a CPU is allowed to enter an idle state, and possibly to prevent that to guarantee reliable device functioning. -- 2.17.1
