On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:15:27PM +0800, Peter Cai wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019, 7:55 PM Andy Shevchenko < > [email protected]> wrote:
> > I guess most of these #ifdef:s makes code less readable for exchange of > saving > few bytes in the module footprint. > > Well since they can only be used when ACPI is supported > (devm_acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios does not exist without ACPI defined, thus > the last guard must exist), This is not correct. > if they were not guarded then we would be left > with a bunch of unused variables warnings when building without ACPI which > doesn't seem good. Good / no-good is only matter of few dozens of bytes here and there to be saved. > Should we use __maybe_unused here instead of #ifdef guards? No, it won't make sense, because the structures will be part of _add_driver_gpio() call, due to which compiler likely can't recognize unused structures. However, you may try with warnings enabled `make W=1`. > > Comma at the end? > > I was trying to follow the style of this driver but it doesn't seem to be > really consistent within itself. Another dmi_system_id definition in the > same file mixed both styles so I was kind of confused. I see. So, this is for Dmitry's preferences. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
