From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

We used to check ->i_op for being nfs_dir_inode_operations.  With
separate inode_operations for v3 and v4 that became bogus, but
rather than going for protocol-dependent comparison we could've
just checked ->i_fop instead; _that_ is the same for all protocol
versions.

Reviewed-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
---
 fs/nfs/super.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
index 89751ce21110..6f4983fc3937 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
@@ -2569,7 +2569,7 @@ int nfs_clone_sb_security(struct super_block *s, struct 
dentry *mntroot,
        unsigned long kflags = 0, kflags_out = 0;
 
        /* clone any lsm security options from the parent to the new sb */
-       if (d_inode(mntroot)->i_op != 
NFS_SB(s)->nfs_client->rpc_ops->dir_inode_ops)
+       if (d_inode(mntroot)->i_fop != &nfs_dir_operations)
                return -ESTALE;
 
        if (NFS_SB(s)->caps & NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL)
-- 
2.17.2

Reply via email to