On 9/6/19 9:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The locked_vm member of struct user_struct is guarded by an #ifdef, > which breaks building the new watch_queue driver when all the other > subsystems that need it are disabled: > > drivers/misc/watch_queue.c:315:38: error: no member named 'locked_vm' in > 'struct user_struct'; did you mean 'locked_shm'? > > Add watch_queue to the list.
Should we either: 1) Make it unconditionally available or 2) Introduce a symbol for this that others can select, like CONFIG_NEEDS_USER_LOCKED_VM or something like that. ? -- Jens Axboe
