On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:29:27 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:06 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote: > > From: Jose R. Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ext4: FLEX_BG Kernel support v2. > > > > > @@ -702,13 +702,15 @@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struct super_block > > *sb, unsigned long ino) > > #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010 > > #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS 0x0040 /* extents > > support */ > > #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT 0x0080 > > +#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG 0x0200 > > Any reason why 0x100 is skipped ? > > Thanks, > Badari > Because 0x0100 is reserved for EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MMP in e2fsprogs. -JRS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
