* Florian Weimer:

> * Carlos O'Donell:
>> On 9/11/19 3:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Carlos O'Donell:
>>>> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
>>>> registration like we do for set_robust_list().
>>> Note that this depends on the in-tree system call numbers list, which I
>>> still need to finish according to Joseph's specifications.
>> Which work is this? Do you have a URL reference to WIP?
>   <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-05/msg00630.html>
>   <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-06/msg00015.html>

Sorry, there was also this:


I also posted a build-many-glibcs.py patch at some point with an
automatic table update, but that still had the massive bot-cycle time.

My current line of thinking is to implement some --use-compilers flag,
so that you can build a fresh glibc checkout against an old, pre-built
compilers for the system call tables update, and then use the patched
glibc sources for one (and hopefully final) bot-cycle.


Reply via email to