On 12.09.19 09:02, Thomas Huth wrote:
> It's not required, so drop it to make it clear that this interrupt
> does not have any extra parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index b5fd6e85657c..3e7efdd9228a 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -1477,8 +1477,7 @@ static int __inject_sigp_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> struct kvm_s390_irq *irq)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int __inject_sigp_restart(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -                              struct kvm_s390_irq *irq)
> +static int __inject_sigp_restart(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>       struct kvm_s390_local_interrupt *li = &vcpu->arch.local_int;
>  
> @@ -1997,7 +1996,7 @@ static int do_inject_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct 
> kvm_s390_irq *irq)
>               rc = __inject_sigp_stop(vcpu, irq);
>               break;
>       case KVM_S390_RESTART:
> -             rc = __inject_sigp_restart(vcpu, irq);
> +             rc = __inject_sigp_restart(vcpu);
>               break;
>       case KVM_S390_INT_CLOCK_COMP:
>               rc = __inject_ckc(vcpu);
> 

Yeah, why not

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to