On 9/12/19 4:08 PM, Walter Wu wrote:
extern void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int order); diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.kasan b/lib/Kconfig.kasan index 6c9682ce0254..dc560c7562e8 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.kasan +++ b/lib/Kconfig.kasan @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ config KASAN_GENERIC select SLUB_DEBUG if SLUB select CONSTRUCTORS select STACKDEPOT + select PAGE_OWNER + select PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK help Enables generic KASAN mode. Supported in both GCC and Clang. With GCC it requires version 4.9.2 @@ -63,6 +65,8 @@ config KASAN_SW_TAGS select SLUB_DEBUG if SLUB select CONSTRUCTORS select STACKDEPOT + select PAGE_OWNER + select PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK helpWhat is the difference between PAGE_OWNER+PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK and DEBUG_PAGEALLOC?
Same memory usage, but debug_pagealloc means also extra checks and restricting memory access to freed pages to catch UAF.
If you directly enable PAGE_OWNER+PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK,don't you think low-memory device to want to use KASAN?
OK, so it should be optional? But I think it's enough to distinguish no PAGE_OWNER at all, and PAGE_OWNER+PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK together - I don't see much point in PAGE_OWNER only for this kind of debugging.
So how about this? KASAN wouldn't select PAGE_OWNER* but it would be recommended in the help+docs. When PAGE_OWNER and KASAN are selected by user, PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK gets also selected, and both will be also runtime enabled without explicit page_owner=on. I mostly want to avoid another boot-time option for enabling PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK. Would that be enough flexibility for low-memory devices vs full-fledged debugging?

