On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:01:42PM +0000, Tony W Wang-oc wrote:
> + /* Checks after this one are Intel/Zhaoxin-specific: */
> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
> + boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN)
Is it time to have a big cleanup on how we handle similarities
and oddities in the MCE subsystem? We've been adding ad-hoc
tests like this in random places ... and it all looks very
messy. Lines that mention x86_vendor|x86|x86_model below
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/ currently look like this:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c: (c->x86_model >= 0x10 &&
c->x86_model <= 0x2F)) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c: c->x86_model >= 0x10 && c->x86_model <=
0x2F &&
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c: } else if (c->x86 == 0x17 &&
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c: if (c->x86 == 0x15 && bank == 4) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c: if (c->x86 == 0x17 &&
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor ==
X86_VENDOR_HYGON ||
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: c->x86 > 6) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor !=
X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor ==
X86_VENDOR_INTEL ||
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86 < 0x11 && cfg->bootlog < 0) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86 == 0x15 && c->x86_model <=
0xf)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86 == 15 &&
this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks) > 4) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86 != 5)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if ((c->x86 > 6 || (c->x86 == 6 &&
c->x86_model >= 0xe)) &&
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model < 0x1A
&& this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks) > 0)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if ((c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0xf &&
c->x86_stepping >= 0xe) ||
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model <= 13
&& cfg->bootlog < 0)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 45)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86 == 6 &&
this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks) > 0)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD ||
c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_UNKNOWN) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: m->cpuvendor = boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor;
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c: switch (c->x86_vendor) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/inject.c: boot_cpu_data.x86 < 0x17) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/inject.c: m->cpuvendor = boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor;
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c: if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor !=
X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c: switch (c->x86_model) {
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c: boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor ==
X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c: if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor ==
X86_VENDOR_AMD ||
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/therm_throt.c: if (c->x86 == 6 &&
(c->x86_model == 9 || c->x86_model == 13)) {
Maybe we can X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN to this jumble with the excuse that
it is already so ugly that this patch series only makes things 5% worse?
Or should we make a big table of CPU vendors/families/models and use
x86_match_cpu() to pick out what are running on and set some bits/flags
(like X86_FEATURE/X86_BUG) which we can use in the code to do the
right thing in each place?
E.g. default for Intel and Zhaoxin vendors would be to set MCE_INTEL_LIKE.
Thoughts?
-Tony
