On Sat, 7 Sep 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 11:16:00PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Now #1 is actually a sensible and feasible solution which can be pulled
> > > off
> > > in a reasonably short time frame, avoids all the bound to be ugly and
> > > failure laden attempts of fixing late loading completely and provides a
> > > usable and safe solution for joe user, jack admin and the super experts at
> > > big-cloud corporate.
> > >
> > > That is not requiring any new format of microcode payload, as this can be
> > > nicely done as a metadata package which comes with the microcode
> > > payload. So you get the following backwards compatible states:
> > >
> > > Kernel metadata result
> > >
> > > old don't care refuse late load
> > >
> > > new No refuse late load
> > >
> > > new Yes decide based on metadata
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > This is 100% in line with what we proposed...
>
> So what it hindering you to implement that? ucode teams whining about the
> little bit of extra work?
That said, there is also a distinct lack of information about micro code
loading in a safe way in general. We absolutely do not know whether a micro
code update affects any instruction which might be in use during the update
on a sibling. Right now it's all load and pray and the SDM is not really
helpful with that either.
Thanks,
tglx
