From: Doug Berger <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit c51bc12d06b3a5494fbfcbd788a8e307932a06e9 ]
A timing hazard exists when an early fork/exec thread begins
exiting and sets its mm pointer to NULL while a separate core
tries to update the section information.
This commit ensures that the mm pointer is not NULL before
setting its section parameters. The arguments provided by
commit 11ce4b33aedc ("ARM: 8672/1: mm: remove tasklist locking
from update_sections_early()") are equally valid for not
requiring grabbing the task_lock around this check.
Fixes: 08925c2f124f ("ARM: 8464/1: Update all mm structures with section
adjustments")
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Cc: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <[email protected]>
Cc: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
index a9f6705aea238..731b7e64715b9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -691,7 +691,8 @@ static void update_sections_early(struct section_perm
perms[], int n)
if (t->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
continue;
for_each_thread(t, s)
- set_section_perms(perms, n, true, s->mm);
+ if (s->mm)
+ set_section_perms(perms, n, true, s->mm);
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
set_section_perms(perms, n, true, current->active_mm);
--
2.20.1