On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 23:17 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > It look like a false positive to me, but really, for a patchset of this > complexity and maturity I cannot fathom how it could have escaped any > lockdep testing.
I test with lockdep all the time. The problem was that lockdep doesn't complain until you have 8 nested locks, and I only tested on a 4-cpu system. I lowered the lockdep nesting limit to 3, and got the warning on my machine. -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
