On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:12:32 +0200
roel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >  #define ata_id_cdb_intr(id)        (((id)[0] & 0x60) == 0x20)
> > +#define ata_id_has_hipm(id)        \
> > +   ( (((id)[76] != 0x0000) && ((id)[76] != 0xffff)) && \
> > +     ((id)[76] & (1 << 9)) )
>               ^
>               |
> are you sure this
> should be 76?

Yes.

> 
> we can also change the first statement a bit:
>       (!(((id)[76] == 0x0000) || ((id)[76] == 0xffff)) && \
> 
> 
> > +#define ata_id_has_dipm(id)        \
> > +   ( (((id)[76] != 0x0000) && ((id)[76] != 0xffff)) && \
> 
> and:
>       (!(((id)[76] == 0x0000) || ((id)[76] == 0xffff)) && \

I feel this is equivalent functionality and not as readable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to