Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Randy Dunlap ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:08:30 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Randy Dunlap ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:56:35 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:49:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
I think that samples are perfectly fine for documentation and
that the trace example is a good example. I think that most people
who need something like that would need to customize it for their
specific needs anyway.
We don't seem to be making progress...
Time to bring in a Tie-Breaker :)
Yes. Is anyone else interested? :(
I guess that's everyone (except those who are sleeping).
Let's not hold up progress. Just use samples/ for code.
Would you already have the
Makefile
samples/Kconfig
samples/Makefile
core code handy per chance ? (and probably Kconfig sourcing in every
arch ?)
Yes. Here it is. I'm working on add kprobes to it, but you
can go ahead with markers also.
Hi Randy,
I got everything working and I'm thinking about posting all this stuff
soon. Do you think your patch (having renamed Kbuild to Makefile) is
ready to post ?
Yes, AFAIK it is. Do you want me to resend it or do you want to
make it patch M/N in your patches?
--
~Randy
Phaedrus says that Quality is about caring.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
