Hi Catalin > -----Original Message----- > From: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> > Sent: 2019年9月25日 22:38 > To: Justin He (Arm Technology China) <[email protected]> > Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>; Mark Rutland > <[email protected]>; James Morse <[email protected]>; Marc > Zyngier <[email protected]>; Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>; Kirill A. > Shutemov <[email protected]>; linux-arm- > [email protected]; [email protected]; linux- > [email protected]; Suzuki Poulose <[email protected]>; Punit > Agrawal <[email protected]>; Anshuman Khandual > <[email protected]>; Alex Van Brunt > <[email protected]>; Robin Murphy <[email protected]>; > Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>; Andrew Morton <akpm@linux- > foundation.org>; Jérôme Glisse <[email protected]>; Ralph Campbell > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Kaly Xin (Arm Technology > China) <[email protected]>; nd <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] arm64: cpufeature: introduce helper > cpu_has_hw_af() > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:59:20AM +0800, Jia He wrote: > > We unconditionally set the HW_AFDBM capability and only enable it on > > CPUs which really have the feature. But sometimes we need to know > > whether this cpu has the capability of HW AF. So decouple AF from > > DBM by new helper cpu_has_hw_af(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Jia He <[email protected]> > > Suggested-by: Suzuki Poulose <[email protected]> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]> > > Which bug did the kbuild robot actually report? I'd drop this line. > This line is added due to [1]: "If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>"
Yes, I know your concern, it is a little bit confusing. But I don't know how to distinguish the case btw a) original bug report b) bug report of my patch implementation? Thanks for any suggestion. [1] https://www.lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/18/940 -- Cheers, Justin (Jia He)
