Driver has been enabled also for SAM9X60. At the moment the patch which did
this has been sent to mainline the PMC for SAM9X60 wasn't integrated.
SAM9X60 has a new PMC compatible (see commit 01e2113de9a5
("clk: at91: add sam9x60 pmc driver")). Do to this we have to
look for proper PMC compatible here, in SHDWC driver.

Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c 
b/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
index e341cc5c0ea6..1c18f465a245 100644
--- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
+++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
@@ -269,6 +269,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_shdwc_of_match[] = {
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_shdwc_of_match);
 
+static const struct of_device_id at91_pmc_ids[] = {
+       { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-pmc" },
+       { .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-pmc" },
+       { /* Sentinel. */ }
+};
+
 static int __init at91_shdwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
        struct resource *res;
@@ -313,7 +319,7 @@ static int __init at91_shdwc_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
 
        at91_shdwc_dt_configure(pdev);
 
-       np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-pmc");
+       np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, at91_pmc_ids);
        if (!np) {
                ret = -ENODEV;
                goto clk_disable;
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to