On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:45:49PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Wed 2019-09-18 16:34:15, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Add a note warning of re-use of obsolete %pf or %pF extensions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> > > --- > > lib/vsprintf.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c > > index b00b57f9f911f..df59818537b52 100644 > > --- a/lib/vsprintf.c > > +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c > > @@ -2008,6 +2008,8 @@ static char *kobject_string(char *buf, char *end, > > void *ptr, > > * - 'S' For symbolic direct pointers (or function descriptors) with offset > > * - 's' For symbolic direct pointers (or function descriptors) without > > offset > > * - '[Ss]R' as above with __builtin_extract_return_addr() translation > > + * - '[Ff]' Obsolete an now unsupported extension for printing direct > > pointers > > + * or function descriptors. Be careful when re-using %pf or %pF! > > I am not a native speaker but the sentence is hard to parse to me. > Also I miss the word 'symbolic'. IMHO, it described that the output > was a symbol name. > > What about something like? > > * - '[Ff]' %pf and %pF were obsoleted and later removed in favor of > * %ps and %pS. Be careful when re-using these specifiers.
Yes, I'll use this in v8. -- Sakari Ailus [email protected]
