Seems that I found a box that has a config that passes call_rcu_bh as a
function pointer (see net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c), so declaring the
call_rcu_bh has a macro function isn't good enough.
This patch makes it just another name of call_rcu for rcupreempt.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc8-rt1/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc8-rt1.orig/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc8-rt1/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
@@ -42,9 +42,14 @@
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
-#define rcu_qsctr_inc(cpu)
-#define rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu)
-#define call_rcu_bh(head, rcu) call_rcu(head, rcu)
+#define rcu_qsctr_inc(cpu) do { } while (0)
+#define rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu) do { } while (0)
+/*
+ * Someone might want to pass call_rcu_bh as a function pointer.
+ * So this needs to just be a rename and not a macro function.
+ * (no parentheses)
+ */
+#define call_rcu_bh call_rcu
extern void __rcu_read_lock(void);
extern void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
