From: Phil Auld <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit a46d14eca7b75fffe35603aa8b81df654353d80f ]

Enabling WARN_DOUBLE_CLOCK in /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features causes
warning to fire in update_rq_clock. This seems to be caused by onlining
a new fair sched group not using the rq lock wrappers.

  [] rq->clock_update_flags & RQCF_UPDATED
  [] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 54385 at kernel/sched/core.c:210 
update_rq_clock+0xec/0x150

  [] Call Trace:
  []  online_fair_sched_group+0x53/0x100
  []  cpu_cgroup_css_online+0x16/0x20
  []  online_css+0x1c/0x60
  []  cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x231/0x3b0
  []  cgroup_mkdir+0x41b/0x530
  []  kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x61/0xa0
  []  vfs_mkdir+0x108/0x1a0
  []  do_mkdirat+0x77/0xe0
  []  do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1d0
  []  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Using the wrappers in online_fair_sched_group instead of the raw locking
removes this warning.

[ tglx: Use rq_*lock_irq() ]

Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 808db3566ddbc..55a33009f9a54 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9423,18 +9423,18 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, 
struct task_group *parent)
 void online_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
 {
        struct sched_entity *se;
+       struct rq_flags rf;
        struct rq *rq;
        int i;
 
        for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
                rq = cpu_rq(i);
                se = tg->se[i];
-
-               raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
+               rq_lock_irq(rq, &rf);
                update_rq_clock(rq);
                attach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
                sync_throttle(tg, i);
-               raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
+               rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
        }
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1



Reply via email to