* Graeme Smecher <[email protected]> [191004 23:53]: > Hi Andrey, > > On 2019-10-03 6:45 p.m., Andrey Smirnov wrote: > > According to > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.txt, > > i2c-mux-idle-disconnect is a property of a parent node since it > > pertains to the mux/switch as a whole, so move it there and drop all > > of the concurrences in child nodes. > > > > Fixes: d031773169df ("ARM: dts: Adds device tree file for McGill's > > IceBoard, based on TI AM3874") > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <[email protected]> > > Cc: Benoît Cousson <[email protected]> > > Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> > > Cc: Graeme Smecher <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected] > > --- > > > > This is purely a drive-by fix, since it concerns the HW I've never > > heard of before. However I was working with PCA9548 > > (vf610-zii-scu4-aib is my HW) and looking at various users in the > > kernel, when this code caught my eye. Apologies for the noise if this > > fix is somehow bogus. > > > > In case that it matters this patch is based on top of 5.4-rc1. > > Thanks! We do have I2C address collisions on downstream bus segments, so > keeping these segments isolated is important. I'm surprised this patch > was necessary and happy to see it. > > Lightly tested on 5.3. > > Tested-by: Graeme Smecher <[email protected]>
Applying into fixes thanks. Tony
