On 08/10/2019 17:39, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> >> But -fno-strict-overflow mandates 2s complement for all such signed >> issues. >> > > So then there really shouldn't be any ambiguity. I have no idea if > -fno-strict-overflow then also lifts the undefinedness of the right shifts, > gotta get my spade and dig some more. >
Bleh, no luck really. Thinking about it some more you can't overflow by right shifting (logical/arithmetic), so I dunno if signed right shift counts as "such signed issues".
