On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:25:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:40:26 -0700 Mark Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +int qos_add_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 value); > > +int qos_update_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 new_value); > > +void qos_remove_requirement(int qos, char *name); > > It's a bit rude stealing the entire "qos" namespace like this - there are > many different forms of QoS, some already in-kernel. > > s/qos/pm_qos/g ?
lat_qos or something might be more suitable.. it's a latency property, not a power management one (even if pm ends up being the primary user of it). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
