On 07/10/2019 21:41, Francesco Poli wrote: > The differences are probably due to the different precision > of the computations: I don't know the precision of those originally > carried out by Ingo Molnar (single precision? double?), but calc(1) > is an arbitrary precision calculator and, by default, performs > calculations with epsilon = 1e-20 ! > > Please note that, except for the first one, all the differing > values obtained with the calc(1) script have slightly better > errors than the ones found in kernel/sched/core.c ... >
As always patches are welcome, but I don't know how much there is to gain from a tiny error correction in those factors. Out of curiosity, what led you to stare at those numbers? > > Thanks again for the clarification! > Bye. >
