The new secure flag makes userfaultfd use a new "secure" anonymous
file object instead of the default one, letting security modules
supervise userfaultfd use.

Requiring that users pass a new flag lets us avoid changing the
semantics for existing callers.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Colascione <dan...@google.com>
---
 fs/userfaultfd.c                 | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h |  8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index f9fd18670e22..29f920fb236e 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1022,6 +1022,13 @@ static int resolve_userfault_fork(struct userfaultfd_ctx 
*ctx,
 {
        int fd;
 
+       /*
+        * Using a secure-mode UFFD to monitor forks isn't supported
+        * right now.
+        */
+       if (new->flags & UFFD_SECURE)
+               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
        fd = anon_inode_getfd("[userfaultfd]", &userfaultfd_fops, new,
                              O_RDWR | (new->flags & UFFD_SHARED_FCNTL_FLAGS));
        if (fd < 0)
@@ -1841,6 +1848,18 @@ static int userfaultfd_api(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
                ret = -EINVAL;
                goto out;
        }
+       if ((ctx->flags & UFFD_SECURE) &&
+           (features & UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK)) {
+               /*
+                * We don't support UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK on a
+                * secure-mode UFFD: doing so would need us to
+                * construct the new file object in the context of the
+                * fork child, and it's not worth it right now.
+                */
+               ret = -EINVAL;
+               goto out;
+       }
+
        /* report all available features and ioctls to userland */
        uffdio_api.features = UFFD_API_FEATURES;
        uffdio_api.ioctls = UFFD_API_IOCTLS;
@@ -1942,6 +1961,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(userfaultfd, int, flags)
 {
        struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx;
        int fd;
+       static const int uffd_flags = UFFD_SECURE;
 
        if (!sysctl_unprivileged_userfaultfd && !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
                return -EPERM;
@@ -1951,8 +1971,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(userfaultfd, int, flags)
        /* Check the UFFD_* constants for consistency.  */
        BUILD_BUG_ON(UFFD_CLOEXEC != O_CLOEXEC);
        BUILD_BUG_ON(UFFD_NONBLOCK != O_NONBLOCK);
+       BUILD_BUG_ON(UFFD_SHARED_FCNTL_FLAGS & uffd_flags);
 
-       if (flags & ~UFFD_SHARED_FCNTL_FLAGS)
+       if (flags & ~(UFFD_SHARED_FCNTL_FLAGS | uffd_flags))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        ctx = kmem_cache_alloc(userfaultfd_ctx_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1969,8 +1990,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(userfaultfd, int, flags)
        /* prevent the mm struct to be freed */
        mmgrab(ctx->mm);
 
-       fd = anon_inode_getfd("[userfaultfd]", &userfaultfd_fops, ctx,
-                             O_RDWR | (flags & UFFD_SHARED_FCNTL_FLAGS));
+       fd = anon_inode_getfd2("[userfaultfd]", &userfaultfd_fops, ctx,
+                              O_RDWR | (flags & UFFD_SHARED_FCNTL_FLAGS),
+                              ((flags & UFFD_SECURE) ? ANON_INODE_SECURE : 0));
        if (fd < 0) {
                mmdrop(ctx->mm);
                kmem_cache_free(userfaultfd_ctx_cachep, ctx);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h b/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
index 48f1a7c2f1f0..12d7d40d7f25 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
@@ -231,4 +231,12 @@ struct uffdio_zeropage {
        __s64 zeropage;
 };
 
+/*
+ * Flags for the userfaultfd(2) system call itself.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Create a userfaultfd with MAC security checks enabled.
+ */
+#define UFFD_SECURE 1
 #endif /* _LINUX_USERFAULTFD_H */
-- 
2.23.0.700.g56cf767bdb-goog

Reply via email to