On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:46:12AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <li...@armlinux.org.uk>
> > Sent: 2019年9月25日 0:39
> > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang....@nxp.com>; bhelg...@google.com;
> > robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li
> > <leoyang...@nxp.com>; kis...@ti.com; lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com; M.h. Lian
> > <minghuan.l...@nxp.com>; andrew.mur...@arm.com; Mingkai Hu
> > <mingkai...@nxp.com>; linux-...@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] PCI: mobiveil: Add PCIe Gen4 EP driver for NXP
> > Layerscape SoCs
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:17:39AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > > This PCIe controller is based on the Mobiveil GPEX IP, it work in EP
> > > mode if select this config opteration.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  MAINTAINERS                                        |   2 +
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig            |  17 ++-
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile           |   1 +
> > >  .../controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c  | 156
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  4 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)  create mode
> > > 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index b997056..0858b54 100644
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -12363,11 +12363,13 @@ F:
> >     drivers/pci/controller/dwc/*layerscape*
> > >
> > >  PCI DRIVER FOR NXP LAYERSCAPE GEN4 CONTROLLER
> > >  M:       Hou Zhiqiang <zhiqiang....@nxp.com>
> > > +M:       Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>
> > >  L:       linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> > >  L:       linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> > >  S:       Maintained
> > >  F:       Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pcie-gen4.txt
> > >  F:       drivers/pci/controller/mobibeil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.c
> > > +F:       drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c
> > >
> > >  PCI DRIVER FOR GENERIC OF HOSTS
> > >  M:       Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org>
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig
> > > index 2054950..0696b6e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig
> > > @@ -27,13 +27,24 @@ config PCIE_MOBIVEIL_PLAT
> > >     for address translation and it is a PCIe Gen4 IP.
> > >
> > >  config PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4
> > > - bool "Freescale Layerscape PCIe Gen4 controller"
> > > + bool "Freescale Layerscpe PCIe Gen4 controller in RC mode"
> > >   depends on PCI
> > >   depends on OF && (ARM64 || ARCH_LAYERSCAPE)
> > >   depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> > >   select PCIE_MOBIVEIL_HOST
> > >   help
> > >     Say Y here if you want PCIe Gen4 controller support on
> > > -   Layerscape SoCs. The PCIe controller can work in RC or
> > > -   EP mode according to RCW[HOST_AGT_PEX] setting.
> > > +   Layerscape SoCs. And the PCIe controller work in RC mode
> > > +   by setting the RCW[HOST_AGT_PEX] to 0.
> > > +
> > > +config PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4_EP
> > > + bool "Freescale Layerscpe PCIe Gen4 controller in EP mode"
> > > + depends on PCI
> > > + depends on OF && (ARM64 || ARCH_LAYERSCAPE)
> > > + depends on PCI_ENDPOINT
> > > + select PCIE_MOBIVEIL_EP
> > > + help
> > > +   Say Y here if you want PCIe Gen4 controller support on
> > > +   Layerscape SoCs. And the PCIe controller work in EP mode
> > > +   by setting the RCW[HOST_AGT_PEX] to 1.
> > >  endmenu
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile
> > > index 686d41f..6f54856 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile
> > > @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL_HOST) +=
> > > pcie-mobiveil-host.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL_EP) += pcie-mobiveil-ep.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL_PLAT) += pcie-mobiveil-plat.o
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4) += pcie-layerscape-gen4.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4_EP) +=
> > pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.o
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..7bfec51
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +/*
> > > + * PCIe controller EP driver for Freescale Layerscape SoCs
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 NXP Semiconductor.
> > > + *
> > > + * Author: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>  */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of_pci.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/resource.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "pcie-mobiveil.h"
> > > +
> > > +#define PCIE_LX2_BAR_NUM 4
> > > +
> > > +#define to_ls_pcie_g4_ep(x)      dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > +
> > > +struct ls_pcie_g4_ep {
> > > + struct mobiveil_pcie            *mv_pci;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_g4_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > + { .compatible = "fsl,lx2160a-pcie-ep",},
> > > + { },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_g4_epc_features = {
> > > + .linkup_notifier = false,
> > > + .msi_capable = true,
> > > + .msix_capable = true,
> > > + .reserved_bar = (1 << BAR_4) | (1 << BAR_5),
> > 
> >                     BIT(BAR_4) | BIT(BAR_5) ?
> 
> I think use .reserved_bar = (1 << BAR_4) | (1 << BAR_5), is better, because 
> BAR_4 
> is not a bit of register.

Why is whether it's a register or not relevent?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

Reply via email to