On 16/10/2019 13:26, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:04:46PM +0100, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote:
There are a number of structs in net/core/filter.c
that are not exported or declared outside of the
file. Fix the following warnings by making these
all static:

net/core/filter.c:8465:31: warning: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not 
declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8472:27: warning: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not 
declared. Should it be static?
[...]
net/core/filter.c:8935:27: warning: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not 
declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <[email protected]>
---
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]>
Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
  net/core/filter.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index ed6563622ce3..f7338fee41f8 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -8462,18 +8462,18 @@ static u32 sk_msg_convert_ctx_access(enum 
bpf_access_type type,
        return insn - insn_buf;
  }
-const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = {
+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = {
        .get_func_proto         = sk_filter_func_proto,
        .is_valid_access        = sk_filter_is_valid_access,
        .convert_ctx_access     = bpf_convert_ctx_access,
        .gen_ld_abs             = bpf_gen_ld_abs,
  };

Big obvious NAK. I'm puzzled that you try to fix a compile warning, but without
even bothering to compile the result after your patch ...

builds fine. maybe some effort to stop this happening again should be made.

Seen BPF_PROG_TYPE() ?




--
Ben Dooks                               http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer                         Codethink - Providing Genius

https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html

Reply via email to