On 11-10-19, 16:44, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:

> +static irqreturn_t qcom_swrm_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +     struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_id;
> +     u32 sts, value;
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +
> +     ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS, &sts);
> +
> +     if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR) {
> +             ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS, &value);
> +             dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev,
> +                                 "CMD error, fifo status 0x%x\n",
> +                                  value);
> +             ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
> +     }
> +
> +     if ((sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) ||
> +         sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS)
> +             schedule_work(&ctrl->slave_work);

we are in irq thread, so why not do the work here rather than schedule
it?

> +static int qcom_swrm_compute_params(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> +{
> +     struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> +     struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
> +     struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt;
> +     struct sdw_port_runtime *p_rt;
> +     struct qcom_swrm_port_config *pcfg;
> +     int i = 0;
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &bus->m_rt_list, bus_node) {
> +             list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &m_rt->port_list, port_node) {
> +                     pcfg = &ctrl->pconfig[p_rt->num - 1];
> +                     p_rt->transport_params.port_num = p_rt->num;
> +                     p_rt->transport_params.sample_interval = pcfg->si + 1;
> +                     p_rt->transport_params.offset1 = pcfg->off1;
> +                     p_rt->transport_params.offset2 = pcfg->off2;
> +             }
> +
> +             list_for_each_entry(s_rt, &m_rt->slave_rt_list, m_rt_node) {
> +                     list_for_each_entry(p_rt, &s_rt->port_list, port_node) {
> +                             pcfg = &ctrl->pconfig[i];
> +                             p_rt->transport_params.port_num = p_rt->num;
> +                             p_rt->transport_params.sample_interval =
> +                                     pcfg->si + 1;
> +                             p_rt->transport_params.offset1 = pcfg->off1;
> +                             p_rt->transport_params.offset2 = pcfg->off2;
> +                             i++;
> +                     }

Can you explain this one, am not sure I understood this. This fn is
supposed to compute and fill up the params, all I can see is filling up!

> +static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops qcom_swrm_pdm_dai_ops = {
> +     .hw_params = qcom_swrm_hw_params,
> +     .prepare = qcom_swrm_prepare,
> +     .hw_free = qcom_swrm_hw_free,
> +     .startup = qcom_swrm_startup,
> +     .shutdown = qcom_swrm_shutdown,
> +        .set_sdw_stream = qcom_swrm_set_sdw_stream,

why does indent look off to me!
-- 
~Vinod

Reply via email to