On Sat 19-10-19 09:26:19, Dan Williams wrote:
> Check for NULL entries before checking the entry order, otherwise NULL
> is misinterpreted as a present pte conflict. The 'order' check needs to
> happen before the locked check as an unlocked entry at the wrong order
> must fallback to lookup the correct order.
> 
> Reported-by: Jeff Smits <jeff.sm...@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Doug Nelson <doug.nel...@intel.com>
> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
> Fixes: 23c84eb78375 ("dax: Fix missed wakeup with PMD faults")
> Cc: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <wi...@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>

Good catch! The patch looks good to me. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>

                                                                Honza

> ---
>  fs/dax.c |    5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index a71881e77204..08160011d94c 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -221,10 +221,11 @@ static void *get_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, 
> unsigned int order)
>  
>       for (;;) {
>               entry = xas_find_conflict(xas);
> +             if (!entry || WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_is_value(entry)))
> +                     return entry;
>               if (dax_entry_order(entry) < order)
>                       return XA_RETRY_ENTRY;
> -             if (!entry || WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_is_value(entry)) ||
> -                             !dax_is_locked(entry))
> +             if (!dax_is_locked(entry))
>                       return entry;
>  
>               wq = dax_entry_waitqueue(xas, entry, &ewait.key);
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Reply via email to