On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:19:32PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> > > Renaming bpf_event__add_sb_event() to evlist__add_sb_event() and > requiring that the evlist be allocated beforehand.
hum, this seems to be done in previous patch, maybe you need to squash this with the previous one? jirka > > This will allow using the same side band thread and evlist to be used > for multiple purposes in addition to react to PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT soon > after they are generated. > > Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> > Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> > Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> > --- > tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h > index 2c7a50509659..68f315c3df5b 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline int machine__process_bpf(struct machine > *machine __maybe_unused, > return 0; > } > > -static inline int evlist__add_bpf_sb_event(struct evlist **evlist > __maybe_unused, > +static inline int evlist__add_bpf_sb_event(struct evlist *evlist > __maybe_unused, > struct perf_env *env __maybe_unused) > { > return 0; > -- > 2.21.1 >
