Hi Thomas,
Le mer. 29 avril 2020 à 23:04, Thomas Bogendoerfer
<[email protected]> a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
If N fields of X cells should be provided, then that's what the
devicetree should represent, instead of having one single field of
(N*X) cells.
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <[email protected]>
---
arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi | 19 +++++++++----------
arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4770.dtsi | 12 +++++-------
arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi | 24
+++++++++++-------------
arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/x1000.dtsi | 9 ++++-----
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
applied to mips-next. Please check if my resolution of the conflict
in arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi is correct.
Looks good, thanks.
-Paul
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not
necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925,
2.3 ]
