Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context. > > Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue. > > Fixes: 6343a6d4b213 ("rtw88: Add delay on polling h2c command status bit") > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>
Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks. fd5d781964b0 rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11505147/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
