On May 6, 2020 7:03:52 AM PDT, Jason Yan <yanai...@huawei.com> wrote:
>The '==' expression itself is bool, no need to convert it to bool
>again.
>This fixes the following coccicheck warning:
>
>arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c:1478:50-55: WARNING: conversion to bool
>not needed here
>arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c:1479:50-55: WARNING: conversion to bool
>not needed here
>
>Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanai...@huawei.com>
>---
> v2: change the name 'x32' to 'i386'.
>
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
>b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
>index 66cd150b7e54..96fde03aa987 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
>@@ -1475,8 +1475,8 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int
>*addrs, u8 *image,
>       for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
>               const s32 imm32 = insn->imm;
>               const bool is64 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64;
>-              const bool dstk = insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_AX ? false : true;
>-              const bool sstk = insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_AX ? false : true;
>+              const bool dstk = insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_AX;
>+              const bool sstk = insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_AX;
>               const u8 code = insn->code;
>               const u8 *dst = bpf2ia32[insn->dst_reg];
>               const u8 *src = bpf2ia32[insn->src_reg];

"foo ? true : false" is also far better written !!foo when it isn't totally 
redundant.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply via email to