Dear Thomas,

Thank you for the quick reply.

Am 11.05.20 um 09:17 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:

Paul Menzel <[email protected]> writes:

please send patches to LKML and not offlist.

Sorry about that. From `MAINTAINERS` I thought [email protected] is wanted. Other subsystems list LKML explicitly there.

From: Radoslaw Biernacki <[email protected]>

@@ -636,10 +636,24 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
         * Denverton SoCs don't report crystal clock, and also don't support
         * CPUID.0x16 for the calculation below, so hardcode the 25MHz crystal
         * clock.
+        * Also estimation code is not reliable and gives 1.5%  difference for
+        * tsc/clock ratio on Skylake mobile. Therefore below is a hardcoded
+        * crystal frequency for Skylake which was removed by upstream commit
+        * "x86/tsc: Use CPUID.0x16 to calculate missing crystal frequency"
+        * This is temporary workaround for bugs:
+        * b/148108096, b/154283905, b/146787525, b/153400677, b/148178929
+        * chromium/1031054
         */
-       if (crystal_khz == 0 &&
-                       boot_cpu_data.x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT_D)
-               crystal_khz = 25000;
+       if (crystal_khz == 0) {
+               switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
+               case INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE:
+                       crystal_khz = 24000;    /* 24.0 MHz */
+                       break;
+               case INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT_X:
+                       crystal_khz = 25000;    /* 25.0 MHz */
+                       break;
+               }

Aside of being a workaround for Google issues which are probably caused > by 
broken BIOSes

Even if it was caused by broken firmware, wouldn’t Linux’ no regression policy still consider this a regression as user should be able to the Linux kernel “no matter what”?

that patch is broken.

    INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT_D != INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT_X

Good catch. The commit didn’t apply cleanly to the master branch, and I missed this.

I’ll wait for Radoslaw to comment before proceeding further with this.


Kind regards,

Paul

Reply via email to