>From c2d6a0afad370c6fda136704bac9b1ee9557d0eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 22:06:46 -0400 Subject: [PATCH RESEND 4/4] docs: litmus-tests: Clarify about the RCU pre-initialization test
Since this test returned to tools/memory-model/, make sure that it is at least referenced from Documentation/litmus-tests/'s README. Co-developed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Akira Yokosawa <[email protected]> [Alan: grammar nit] Suggested-by: Alan Stern <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <[email protected]> --- Documentation/litmus-tests/README | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/litmus-tests/README b/Documentation/litmus-tests/README index ac0b270b456c..b79e640214b9 100644 --- a/Documentation/litmus-tests/README +++ b/Documentation/litmus-tests/README @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ Atomic-RMW-ops-are-atomic-WRT-atomic_set.litmus RCU (/rcu directory) -------------------- +MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus (under tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/) + Demonstrates the use of rcu_assign_pointer() and rcu_dereference() to + ensure that an RCU reader will not see pre-initialization garbage. + RCU+sync+read.litmus RCU+sync+free.litmus Both the above litmus tests demonstrate the RCU grace period guarantee -- 2.17.1
