Thanks for your comment.
On 12/05/20 11:07 pm, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Just a quick note.. On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 07:40:55PM +0530, Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:+ /* + * Rearrange the weight distribution of the state, increase the weight + * by the LEARNING RATE % for the idle state that was supposed to be + * chosen and reduce by the same amount for rest of the states + * + * If the weights are greater than (100 - LEARNING_RATE) % or lesser + * than LEARNING_RATE %, do not increase or decrease the confidence + * respectively + */ + for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++) { + unsigned int delta; + + if (idx == -1) + break; + if (i == idx) { + delta = (LEARNING_RATE * cpu_data->state_mat[last_idx][i]) / 100;100 is a crap number to divide by as a computer. We bio-puddings happend to have 10 digits, so 100 makes sense to us, but it does not to our binary friends.
Absolutely! I just wrote the code exactly the way I did the Math on paper, definitely need to figure out an optimal way of doing things. ~Pratik
