On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:06:05PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > cpu_has() returns int, > > but would it be better to have something like > > > > if (!mce_disabled && > > !(c->x86_capability & (X86_FEATURE_MCA | X86_FEATURE_MCE)) { > > printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%i: No machine check support available\n", > > smp_processor_id()); > > This looks complicated and is harder to read. Its exactly the purpose of the > cpu_has() macro to avoid such constructs.
It is done via test_bit(), which is designed for IO access with all that `const volatile' stuff, 2 x unnecessary, can't be optimized here (IMHO). ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/