On Wed 13 May 23:40 PDT 2020, Amit Kucheria wrote:

> qcom_scm_iommu_secure_ptbl_init() initialises the args twice, once while
> declaring the struct, and then again by assignment. Remove the duplicate
> assignment.
> 

Seems like a leftover from the refactoring, thanks for spotting this.

> Similarly, move arginfo initialisation to the declaration in
> __qcom_scm_is_call_available for consistency with other .arginfo
> initialisation in the file.
> 

Looks better.

> Fixes: 9a434cee773a ("firmware: qcom_scm: Dynamically support SMCCC and 
> legacy conventions")
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> index 6ba132be1b6e..eae9c28679cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> @@ -228,10 +228,10 @@ static int __qcom_scm_is_call_available(struct device 
> *dev, u32 svc_id,
>               .svc = QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO,
>               .cmd = QCOM_SCM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL,
>               .owner = ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP,
> +             .arginfo = QCOM_SCM_ARGS(1),
>       };
>       struct qcom_scm_res res;
>  
> -     desc.arginfo = QCOM_SCM_ARGS(1);
>       switch (__get_convention()) {
>       case SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32:
>       case SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64:
> @@ -742,12 +742,6 @@ int qcom_scm_iommu_secure_ptbl_init(u64 addr, u32 size, 
> u32 spare)
>       };
>       int ret;
>  
> -     desc.args[0] = addr;
> -     desc.args[1] = size;
> -     desc.args[2] = spare;
> -     desc.arginfo = QCOM_SCM_ARGS(3, QCOM_SCM_RW, QCOM_SCM_VAL,
> -                                  QCOM_SCM_VAL);
> -
>       ret = qcom_scm_call(__scm->dev, &desc, NULL);
>  
>       /* the pg table has been initialized already, ignore the error */
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Reply via email to