Em Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:41:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Thu, May 14, 2020 at 07:10:25PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva escreveu: > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:46:05PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:04 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yep. I just built linux-next --which contains all the flexible-array > > conversions-- with Clang --GCC doesn't catch this issue, not even GCC > > 10-- and I don't see any other issue like this. > > > > I mean, I have run into these other two: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200505235205.GA18539@embeddedor/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200508163826.GA768@embeddedor/ > > > > but those are due to the erroneous application of the sizeof operator > > to zero-length arrays. > > > > > complicated stack allocation I suggested. It may be nice to save > > > cycles if code this pattern is widespread and the code hot. > > > > > > > Apparently, this is the only instace of this sort of issue in the whole > > codebase. > > Adrian Hunter was not CCed, Adrian?
Gustavo, I've removed this from my tree from now till this gets resolved. - Arnaldo
