On 5/17/20 5:02 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> [2] fixes FORCE_ASYNC. I don't want to go through every bit, so
> not sure whether this is an actual issue with [1], but it's just
> safer this way. Please, consider it for-5.7

LGTM, applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Reply via email to