On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 14:01 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of one-element arrays in the following
> form:
> 
> struct something {
>     int length;
>     u8 data[1];
> };
[]
> This issue has been out there since 2009.
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and fixed _manually_.
[]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c
> index 7af31b245636..993a8ae6fdfb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct uv_rtc_timer_head {
>       struct {
>               int     lcpu;           /* systemwide logical cpu number */
>               u64     expires;        /* next timer expiration for this cpu */
> -     } cpu[1];
> +     } cpu[];
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -156,9 +156,8 @@ static __init int uv_rtc_allocate_timers(void)
>               struct uv_rtc_timer_head *head = blade_info[bid];
>  
>               if (!head) {
> -                     head = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct uv_rtc_timer_head) +
> -                             (uv_blade_nr_possible_cpus(bid) *
> -                                     2 * sizeof(u64)),
> +                     head = kmalloc_node(struct_size(head, cpu,
> +                             uv_blade_nr_possible_cpus(bid)),

It's probably safer to use kzalloc_node here as well.

>                               GFP_KERNEL, nid);
>                       if (!head) {
>                               uv_rtc_deallocate_timers();

Reply via email to