On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:17:27PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:26:51AM +0530, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Add gpiochip support for Maxlinear/Exar USB to serial converter
> > for controlling the available gpios.
> > 
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>

> >  static int xr_port_probe(struct usb_serial_port *port)
> >  {
> >     struct usb_serial *serial = port->serial;
> > @@ -495,13 +678,14 @@ static int xr_port_probe(struct usb_serial_port *port)
> >  
> >     usb_set_serial_port_data(port, port_priv);
> >  
> > -   return 0;
> > +   return xr_gpio_init(port);
> 
> Just realised that the gpiochip is registered for 2 interfaces exposed by
> this chip. This is due to the fact that this chip presents CDC-ACM model,
> so there are 2 interfaces (interrupt and bulk IN/OUT).
> 
> We shouldn't need gpiochip for interface 0. So what is the recommended way
> to filter that?

Your driver should only bind to the data interface, but also claim the
control interface (i.e. the reverse of what cdc-acm is doing).

This CDC model doesn't really fit the assumptions of usb-serial core,
but it might be doable. Try returning 1 from the attach callback for the
control interface so that core claims it but doesn't register a tty
device.

Johan

Reply via email to