Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]> writes:

> I think these were added accidentally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 471fccf7f8501..fe3a24fd6b263 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -5299,7 +5299,7 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
>                                
> !intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_single_range_output)))
>                               continue;
>                       break;
> -             case MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A ... MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR3_B: {
> +             case MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A ... MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR3_B:
>                       if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT) ||
>                               msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A >=
>                               
> intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges) * 2)
> @@ -5314,7 +5314,6 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
>                       if (msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 >=
>                           min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, x86_pmu.num_counters_gp))
>                               continue;
> -             }
>               default:
>                       break;
>               }

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <[email protected]>

-- 
Vitaly

Reply via email to