On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:02:13PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: > > So, I think you're going to have to add a work-around to ignore bit 0, > > which brings up the question whether this is worth it or not. > > It does ignore bit 0, it gets turned into the C22 regs flag, and > cleared/ignored in the remainder of the code (do to MMD loop indexes > starting at 1).
However, I've already pointed out that that isn't the case in a number of functions that I listed in another email, and I suspect was glossed over. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up
