Rob,
Could you pay attention to this patch? The patchset review procedure is
nearly over, while the DT part is only partly reviewed by you.
Thanks
-Sergey
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:30:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the
> i2c "reg" property. If it is the compiler will print a warning:
>
> Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@1120000/eeprom@64: I2C bus unit address
> format error, expected "40000064"
> Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@1120000/eeprom@64:reg: I2C address must
> be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000064"
>
> In order to silence dtc up let's discard the flag from the DW I2C DT
> binding example for now. Just revert this commit when dtc is fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <sergey.se...@baikalelectronics.ru>
> Cc: Alexey Malahov <alexey.mala...@baikalelectronics.ru>
> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbog...@alpha.franken.de>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: linux-m...@vger.kernel.org
>
> ---
>
> Changelog v3:
> - This is a new patch created as a result of the Rob request to remove
> the EEPROM-slave bit setting in the DT binndings example until the dtc
> is fixed.
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml
> index 4bd430b2b41d..101d78e8f19d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ examples:
>
> eeprom@64 {
> compatible = "linux,slave-24c02";
> - reg = <0x40000064>;
> + reg = <0x64>;
> };
> };
> - |
> --
> 2.26.2
>
