Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] checks: Improve i2c reg property checking

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Joel,

On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:50:37 +0930 Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> wrote:
>
>  
>  #define I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS        (1 << 30)
> +#define I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS  (1 << 31)
>  
>  static void check_i2c_bus_reg(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, struct 
> node *node)
>  {
> @@ -1057,10 +1058,13 @@ static void check_i2c_bus_reg(struct check *c, struct 
> dt_info *dti, struct node
>               reg = fdt32_to_cpu(*(cells++));
>               /* Ignore I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS */
>               reg &= ~I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS;
> -             if (reg > 0x3ff)
> +
> +             if ((reg & I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS) && reg > 0x3ff)

Shouldn't this be

                if ((reg & I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS) && ((reg & 
~I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS) > 0x3ff))

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

pgpuGPBqWSYQo.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature