On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 05:10:29PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:26:13PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > > > If there was a revision to this patch, I missed it. Is there still a > > plan to bring CLONE_NEWTIME to clone3()? > > Good that you ask. The discussion ended at the point that we do not have > a way to figure out what a syscall supports from user-space. I talked a > bit with Christian about it and he mentioned that there were some ideas > floating around how to do that. At that point it made more sense to me > to wait for such a solution to appear before continuing the clone3() > time namespace work.
We need to have a little talk at ksummit about some aspects of syscall design. I'm writing something up for this. But we're not in a rush anyway, I take it. Christian
