On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 10:21 AM Greentime Hu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Guo Ren <[email protected]> 於 2020年5月31日 週日 下午11:52寫道:
> >
> > Hi Greentime & Vincent,
> >
> > Thx for the dynamic vlen implementation. I've two suggestions:
> >  - Please give out glibc patches mail URL, we need to review them together.
> >  - We need to consider that not all processes need vectors. Most
> > system processes do not have vector features, and we should not force
> > save/restore vector for every process.
> >
>
> Hi Guo,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patch. We are still cooking the glibc patch,
> we will add the glibc link address once we post it.
> For the save/restore mechanism in signal, it is basically the same
> with FPU porting, we can optimize it when setup_sigcontext() for both
> FPU and VECTOR in the future.
>
> /* Save the floating-point state. */
> if (has_fpu)
>         err |= save_fp_state(regs, &sc->sc_fpregs);
> /* Save the vector state. */
> if (has_vector)
>         err |= save_v_state(regs, sc);
>
> There should be a better way to detect whether this task use
> fpu/vector or not. Might be elf attributes or something else.
Ok, we could improve it in future patches.

-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/

Reply via email to