On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 10:40:33AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The counter is incremented via pm_runtime_get even in failure case.
> > To correct the counter call pm_runtime_put in case of failure, too.
> 
> How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
> 
>    Change description:
>    The PM runtime reference counter is generally incremented by a call of
>    the function “pm_runtime_get_sync”.
>    Thus call the function “pm_runtime_put_autosuspend” also in one error case
>    to keep the reference counting consistent.

The original changelog is perfectly fine, please stop sending these.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to