On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:54:03PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > Does that answer your question, or were you worried about us needing > to init iobuf[0] to 0 in some other case? > > -Doug
No, but it should be treated as a bug fix for CR50 implementation i.e. for 797c0113c9a481d4554988d70b5b52fae657262f, or is there some reason why it shouldn't? /Jarkko
